The Ghetto

English: Warsaw Ghetto, smashed into the groun...

Warsaw Ghetto, smashed into the ground by German Vernichtungskommando, according to Adolf Hitler`s order.

Pogroms against specified minorities, often used as scapegoats for society’s ills, are a fact of western civilisation. The ghetto is an effective tool of the ruling class, against the disenfranchised, the minority race, ethnicity, culture, or religion. It is very functional to mass a targeted population in one central location. Tracing the term, allegedly, to Vienna, the ghetto concept was institutionalized as an effective government tool by Prince Klement von Metternich, an eighteenth century Austrian diplomat and governmental puppeteer. It was in Metternich’s day, that the concept of the Jewish Ghetto flowered. Unique, concentrated, ethnic communities existed in Europe, and unwanted minorities were shunned in specific locales, long before Metternich, but under his rule, walled neighborhoods rapidly evolved, and became institutionalized. Targeting, isolating, and containing an entire ethnic population to make pogroms more efficient and effective was one of the Prince’s most renowned achievements. Metternich’s eighteenth century social experiment resulted in the birth of the fabulously wealthy House of Rothschild, as well as enabling Adolf Hitler’s final solution.

Fear of the ‘others’, outsiders, is especially effective as a tool against the immigrant. Immigrants speak a different language, have different customs, and often have different skin pigmentation. Immigrants are very convenient scapegoats. In a dysfunctional society, marred by economic suffering, the immigrant is an easy target. We have seen this behaviour repeated time and time again against different religious sects and ethnicities in America. Puritans discriminated against other Protestants, especially Baptists and Quakers, and Catholics. The ethnic majority English population discriminated against the incoming Germans, and later, against the Irish and Italians. Current discrimination against the Latino population is merely a repetition of an age old tradition.

Arizona’s legendary SB1070, and its offshoots in Alabama and Georgia, put a new spin on the phenomenon. Latino immigrants, because of ethnic affinities, and due to societal pressure, not unlike the governmental pressure of Metternich’s day, live in insular, ethnically characteristic neighborhoods. Signage is often solely in Spanish. Buildings, commercial, as well as residential, are frequently decorated in bright hues. Vehicles, a significant investment, especially to the poor and disenfranchised, may be parked in front yards, to increase their security. Crossing the street in any American city, especially in the Southwest, is regularly a journey from an Anglo dominated world, to Mexico, Central, or South America. Language and culture are immediately skewed, an experience profoundly awakening and dissident to the culturally ethnocentric or racist. This is a journey into the land of the ‘others’.

Identical to the actions of the Waffen SS in the Warsaw ghetto, Anglo dominated law enforcement continues to carry out ‘sweeps’ of predominantly Latino neighborhoods. Homes are invaded by deputies, to show a dominant presence, under pretense of searching for drugs or contraband. Motorists are stopped because of their skin pigmentation or hair color, using the bogus excuse of traffic violations. Pedestrians are targeted because they are walking in the ‘wrong’ neighborhoods.

As in the Warsaw Ghetto, entire families disappear in the middle of the night. Rather than being rounded up and taken to camps, the targeted population often independently vanishes to far away new locations, to more tolerant states or to their country of origin, in fear of persecution. Often, but not always, do they flee, because the same disappearance happens in the case of the notorious ‘sweeps’, wherein persons unable to adequately prove US citizenship or documentation of legal residency, vanish into ‘the system’.

The motivation for racial profiling and sweeps is abundantly clear. In their never ending quest for absolute wealth and power, Charles and David Koch funded the creation of ALEC, in 1973. Among the many ‘member corporations’ of ALEC, is the Corrections Corporation of America. CCA is an interstate, private prison corporation, which seeks to supplant public prisons. ALEC scholars write ‘model legislation’ for state government. Arizona SB 1070, the notorious immigration law, and inspiration for similar legislation in Alabama and Georgia, is a typical example of such legislation. Written by Kansas Secretary of State, Kris Kobach, with the assistance of ALEC, SB 1070 created an entire population as fodder for the profit seeking private prison system. Latinos, because of their unique language and culture, became more than merely ‘different’. They became, as a population, ‘illegal’, and were targeted for arrest, whether undocumented or not. Statistics support the thesis that American citizens, whose families have lived in the Southwest, since before the American Revolution, have been among SB 1070’s victims. Racial profiling, due to SB 1070, was legalized.

A new twist exists in the old ghetto mentality: profit. Take a population and make it illegal. House these ‘criminals’ in private prisons after they have been incarcerated in county facilities, and before being handed over to ICE, for deportation, and CCA turns a nice little profit. This action is supported by a population’s racist fears of ‘the others’ in economically challenging times. Rank and file union members, not necessarily racist as a norm, cry out in support of SB 1070, as a way to protect their assumed, threatened livelihoods. Union leaders, not necessarily racist themselves, follow the desires of their rank and file, and influence political parties for support, which is granted. Management of the political party is sympathetic, because their orders come with donations from an investor class which profits from CCA’s earnings. Society’s disease comes full circle. The etiology is Koch brothers inspired spin. It is classic Goebbels propaganda. As in the whispers of the radio announcers, steadily growing to a crescendo, in the movie ‘Cabaret’, the insidious rumors of economic disenfranchisement by ‘illegal aliens’ becomes the mantra of the dominant population. Koch investment in a profitable private prison system is secure. Adolf Hitler said that if one tells a big enough lie, and repeats it often enough, it becomes the truth. As Nazis harvested personal effects, gold fillings, hair, and even human skin to profit from their targeted populations, Charles and David Koch profit from an entire population, outright. It is the same behaviour, only less brutal.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

PayDay Paton

English: Picture of Jonathan Paton, candidate ...

Jonathan Paton, Republican candidate for Congress, in Arizona CD-1

Jonathan Paton, also known as “PayDay Paton”, is  running for the US Congress as a Republican in CD-1. Paton is a lobbyist for the Payday loans business. In 2004, Jonathan Paton worked for the Community Financial Services Association, a payday lending  alliance.  Paton supported an industry-written ballot initiative  allowing payday lenders to remain open indefinitely,  overriding a law which required them to shut down in 2010. His efforts would allow payday lenders to “continue to be allowed indefinitely making short-term loans with fees that are equal to 390 percent annual interest, but with new restrictions on how they deal with customers.”

Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard dealt a serious blow to payday lenders who attempted to skirt a ban on their day-to-day functioning with “Operation Sunset” .  Goddard notified Arizona payday loan companies that he would enforce the legislated ban on usury and prosecute any attempts to evade the law.

A resident of Tucson, Arizona, Paton announced his candidacy for CD-1 but must move into that district, in order to be a qualified candidate.  Yes, that’s correct, he did not live in CD-1 when he filed to run for office and this instantly brings to mind questions of his personal ethics.  Arizona voters in the 8th District already rebuffed Paton’s 2010 campaign, and it is hoped that CD-1 voters will follow suit.  According to the Arizona Secretary of State Lobbyist System, Paton is currently a registered lobbyist.  Amber Moon, of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee,  publicly stated, “Arizonans need a Representative who will fight for them in Washington, not a payday lending lobbyist like Jonathan Paton who places special interests above the middle class.  Arizona voters in the Eighth District rejected Jonathan Paton in 2010, and voters in the First Congressional District won’t trust a lobbyist carpetbagger in 2012.”

Remember Wes Gullet, the lobbyist who lost to Greg Stanton in the recent Phoenix Mayoral race?  Gullet publicly admitted that he intended to continue his lobbying efforts if he was elected Mayor of Phoenix.  Wes Gullett was Chief of Staff for Arizona Governor Fife Symington, from July 1993 to April 1996, and his tenure coincided with Symington’s failed attempted  takeover of Grand Canyon National Park, to make it a State Park under his control.  Symington had a long term cozy relationship with mining interests, who would have begun uranium mining at the Grand Canyon upon Symington’s taking it over.  Considering the current attempt to institute uranium mining at the Grand Canyon, one wonders if this might not be déjà vu on several levels.

Two other Arizona men who currently work behind the scenes,  simultaneously bankrolling candidates,  are Mario Diaz and Stan Barnes.   Diaz runs Mario E. Diaz & Associates, a full-service government relations and public affairs firm in Phoenix, Arizona.  Among his affiliations is retired US Senator Dennis DeConcini,  currently a board member of the Corrections Corporation of America, and formerly linked to the Keating Five scandal.  Stan Barnes is the founder and President of Copper State Consulting Group which is also “a full service government relations and public affairs firm in Phoenix Arizona.”  In short, Mario Diaz and Stan Barnes are lobbyists.   Diaz and Barnes are two of the biggest Payday Loan lobbyists in Arizona.

Who has Payday Loan lobbyist Stan Barnes contributed to?

$6,500 to the Arizona Republican Party

$8,925 to John McCain

$4,575 to Jon Kyl

$6,200 to David Schweikert

$1,500 to Paul Gosar

$1,450 to Trent Franks

$500 to John Boehner

Obviously, Stan Barnes has donated heavily to influence conservative legislators. It is clear where his sympathies lie.  Barnes has also contributed $4,400 to Jonathan Payton.

Mario Diaz  gave money to numerous Democratic candidates, and has donated $7,600 to the Arizona State Democratic Central Executive Committee, alone.  Playing both ends against the middle, Barnes has also contributed  to the Arizona State Democratic Central Executive Committee, in the amount of $3,000.

In addition to Barnes’ contributions to “PayDay Paton”, both lobbyists have contributed to the campaign of Ann Kirkpatrick. Diaz has contributed $8,246 to the Kirkpatrick campaign. Barnes has contributed $2,500.

A total of $10,746 has been contributed by these two Payday Loan lobbyists to Ann Kirkpatrick!  This is, of course, $6,346 more than the amount contributed by Stan Barnes to Payday lobbyist Jonathan Paton.

What is the price for this loyalty?  Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard struck a blow against loan sharks, yet these Payday Loan lobbyists continue to peddle their influence on candidates in  both parties.  These lobbyists, it seems, have spent more on the candidate endorsed by the Arizona Democratic Party, than on their own lobbyist candidate, and one can only wonder why.  The Arizona State Democratic Central Executive Committee has received $10,600 and candidate Ann Kirkpatrick,  $10,746 from two of the biggest Payday Loan lobbyists in Arizona.  What will be the price for such loyalty?

Sources:

Arizona Capitol Times, 4/02/10; 1/25/12.

Arizona Daily Star, 6/6/10; 9/25/08; 10/19/08.

Arizona Secretary of State Lobbyist System.

http://dccc.org/blog/entry/payday-lending_lobbyist_jonathan_paton_not_right_for_arizona/.

http://www.azag.gov/press_releases/july/2010/Press%20Release-Payday%20Lenders%20Departure%20Shows%20Repeal%20is%20Working.html

http://www.fec.gov/finance/disclosure/norindsea.shtml.

http://www.copperstate.net/teambarnes.htm

http://medandassociates.com/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Apache Leap

English: , member of the United States House o...

Former US Representative, Ann Kirkpatrick

The following is reprinted from “The Hill”, first printed on 05/11/10.

Arizona lawmakers spark ire of Apaches over copper mine, land exchange

By Sean J. Miller – 05/11/10 06:00 AM ET

SUPERIOR, Ariz. — A local dispute in this old mining town has sparked a legislative battle on Capitol Hill, and the outcome could affect the reelection races of two incumbents in Congress.

A proposed land exchange between the federal government and an international mining conglomerate would carve thousands of acres out of the surrounding national forest — land the Apache Indians consider sacred. Over the last several years, the effort to open a protected area to mining for the first time has become embroiled in an ethics controversy and sparked an environment-versus-jobs debate.

Digging for copper. Underneath the surface is one of the world’s largest untapped copper deposits — by some estimates, enough to supply a quarter of America’s annual demand for more than 50 years.

The chairman of the nearby San Carlos Apache Tribe, the Inter-Tribal Council of Arizona, former miners and environmentalists vehemently oppose the land exchange. They’re up against Resolution Copper Co., its congressional allies and a town hungry for the jobs the mine would bring.

The state’s economy is in the doldrums, and the Copper Triangle region in the heart of Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick’s (D-Ariz.) district is no exception.

Her reelection prospects, and to some extent those of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who has pushed the land swap bill in the Senate, may hinge on getting the legislation passed.

McCain is in a challenging primary race and Kirkpatrick represents a district he carried by 10 percentage points in the 2008 presidential election.

Kirkpatrick and McCain aren’t the first to champion the land exchange.

Former Rep. Rick Renzi (R-Ariz.), Kirkpatrick’s predecessor in the House, wanted land owned by one of his supporters included in the exchange. Resolution Copper balked, and the congressman was subsequently indicted, which ended his political career. The legislation, tainted by association, died.

The bill found new life after it was re-branded by McCain and Kirkpatrick as a no-cost stimulus for Arizona. “Because it’s a jobs bill, it’s a top priority,” Kirkpatrick said recently.

The measure would see the federal government give Resolution Copper 2,400 acres of the Tonto National Forest in exchange for 5,500 acres of ecologically valuable property across Arizona. Usually, land exchange bills move through Congress swiftly and without much fanfare. But the Copper Basin Jobs Act has been an exception.

The legislation is being held up by environmental concerns and the inclusion in the exchange of the Oak Flats Campground northeast of Superior, which was protected from development by President Dwight Eisenhower in 1955.

It’s where the Apache harvest acorns and pray, and despite assurances from Kirkpatrick about environmental protections to safeguard the area, the tribe is concerned the mine will destroy one of its most sacred sites.

Apache skepticism of government promises is captured in the legend of a cliff that divides Oak Flats from Superior. An Apache band, the story goes, refusing to surrender its land and move to the reservations, leapt to its death here when surrounded by federal soldiers. The area, known today as Apache Leap, is considered a burial ground by the tribe.

When Kirkpatrick ran for Congress in 2008, she came to the San Carlos Reservation for a fundraiser organized by Wendsler Nosie Sr., the Apache tribe’s chairman.

“The tribe fully supported her,” said Nosie.

Backing from the tribes is significant in Arizona’s 1st House district; Native Americans make up roughly 20 percent of the population, one of the highest concentrations in the country.

A falling-out. Two years after the San Carlos fundraiser, Nosie is no longer on speaking terms with Kirkpatrick. The rift between the freshman lawmaker and many in Eastern Arizona’s Indian Country started several months after she won election to the House. That’s when she first staked out a firm position on the mining project.

While in Washington for the passage of a resolution honoring the legendary Apache leader, Geronimo, last February, Nosie went to Kirkpatrick’s office for a meeting. He had heard rumors that she was planning to support the exchange and wanted to remind her of the tribe’s view.

That day Nosie and Martha Interpreter-Baylish, a member of the San Carlos tribal council, sat down with Kirkpatrick and her chief of staff, Michael Frias, around a coffee table in her office.

“Back in Arizona I’m hearing you’re supporting Resolution Copper,” Nosie recalled saying.

He asked her directly whether she supported the bill. Kirkpatrick responded that she did. They talked about the tribe’s environmental concerns, and the conversation quickly became tense, according to several accounts.

“Ann, the reason why I’m here is because you had told me that you would definitely hear both sides of the story,” Nosie said.
Kirkpatrick leaned forward in her chair.

“Chairman, tell me, how is your religion going to put food on the table?” she said. “Tell me how your religion is going to help the children getting abused by their parents. How is your religion going to turn the bed sheets of your elders?”

The chairman stopped her. “Ann, don’t even go there,” he said.

The meeting broke up minutes later. The chairman and Kirkpatrick haven’t spoken directly since.

“I certainly appreciate the importance of sacred sites,” said Kirkpatrick, who grew up on an Apache reservation, where her father ran a general store. “But I will tell you that I’ve also visited with other members of the tribe who say, ‘Look, we need these jobs.’ My take on it is that most people in that region, including many of the tribal members, really want the economic development that’s going to come with this project.”

Kirkpatrick’s bill has been assigned to the House Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands, which is chaired by Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.). He has long opposed the legislative effort, but is preparing to present his fellow Democrat with an alternative piece of legislation.

“I think we’re selling ourselves short. This company, I don’t trust them,” Grijalva said recently, noting he felt there weren’t strict enough environmental protections in Kirkpatrick’s bill.

“We’re willing to sit and talk about an alternative legislative solution,” he said.

Kirkpatrick’s version includes a stipulation that a full environmental study be conducted and the results approved by the secretary of Agriculture before the land is conveyed to the company. A previous version stipulated only a truncated study and mandatory conveyance regardless of the results.

Grijalva plans to present Kirkpatrick with his own version of the bill soon.

Kirkpatrick said she’s cautiously optimistic. “I’m definitely going to push this legislation ahead,” she said, although she’s aware the chairman’s discretion will dictate when her bill is brought before his panel.

Kirkpatrick is aware that while she waits for Grijalva, McCain is working to put the exchange into an omnibus lands bill that could be approved in this Congress.

In an interview with The Hill earlier this year, McCain expressed frustration with Grijalva and indicated the bill is a priority for him.

The pressure is building, meanwhile, on Kirkpatrick. Resolution Copper ran a series of ads in local newspapers telling Kirkpatrick, “We’re counting on you to help pass this bill now.”

The company has spent more than $1.2 million on federal lobbyists since 2003, public records show.

A town in need of jobs. Kirkpatrick does not directly answer a question on whether she’s made the calculation that jobs are more important than the religious practices of the Apache. She talks about finding a balance between the two, but also points to the traditions of Superior and the surrounding mining towns.

“This region has been a mining region for a hundred years. I talk with miners who are third-, fourth-generation miners in this area. It’s not only their livelihood, it’s also their life,” she said.

Most residents of Superior are impatient for the exchange to go ahead. “This is a no-brainer. This doesn’t cost the federal government anything. We’re not asking them for a bailout. Let it move ahead,” said Michael Hing, the mayor of Superior.

The area was first settled at the end of the 19th century by prospectors and immigrant laborers who came to work in the surrounding small-scale mines. The mayor himself comes from a long line of miners. “I’m 100 percent Chinese,” he said during a drive around Superior, noting that his grandfather came over from China to work in the mines.

The center of town is now mostly a collection of boarded-up storefronts and adjacent streets lined with rundown bungalows. The town’s population has dropped from some 7,000 at the height of its mining heyday to about 3,200 today. Hing and other supporters view the project as a way to make their town flourish again. “We had shoe stores, barbershops, we had a full-time doctor here, a working movie theater — all those amenities that make a good little town,” he said.

Cabinet secretaries visit the area. On a recent afternoon a homemade sign on a building on Main Street read, “Thank you, Secretary Vilsack.” It was left over from his visit, at Kirkpatrick’s invitation, six weeks prior. Last August, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar made a similar visit at McCain’s behest. Several weeks before the trip, McCain lifted his holds on two Interior Department nominees — holds he had placed in order to get the administration’s support for the lands exchange.

“The thing about Sen. McCain and Congresswoman Kirkpatrick working hard is getting the bureaucrats to come out here and take a look at this whole project,” said Hing. “You can talk about it and talk about it, but unless you walk on it and go through the town and see what we’re facing, you don’t really get the whole gist of it.”

The objections of environmental groups like the Sierra Club and the Arizona Mining Reform Coalition are unfounded, Hing says.

“Give me a break. We made our lives here,” he said. “I’m an environmentalist because I’m raising my four kids here. I’m very concerned about the water, the air, the land quality.”

Resolution Copper is already making preparations to mine underneath the Oak Flats Campground, expanding its existing shafts for the day it’ll be able to start harvesting the ore that lies about 7,000 feet below the surface.

In the meantime, the company is spending $50 million to reclaim the old Magma Mine site, which extends from north of downtown Superior over Apache Leap. “Doing the reclamation was a way for us to demonstrate to the community that we would take care of the environment,” said David Salisbury, Resolution Copper’s chief executive.

The Magma Mine was operational for close to a century. The old smokestack from the smelter is visible from almost anywhere in town. Before it closed in the 1990s, the miners clipped the top of what was later determined to be a mountain-sized copper ore body, though at the time they couldn’t reach it.

The international mining giant Rio Tinto got wind of the find and bought the mine. It then partnered with BHP-Billiton to set up a subsidiary, which became known as Resolution Copper.

“We will mine out of this mine in the first year more than they took out of [the old one] in its nearly a century of life,” Salisbury said outside one of the old mine’s refurbished buildings. “That’s the difference in the scale of the mine.”

Kirkpatrick’s office estimates the project will create close to 2,000 jobs. But critics say it’ll be years before the first paychecks are cut, because the mine is almost a decade away from becoming fully operational.

Labor dispute complicates passage. Environmental concerns aren’t the only thing holding up the bill. Rio Tinto is engaged in a nasty labor dispute at one of its California mines, where it has locked out some 600 workers for months.

A staffer in Kirkpatrick’s office said the company must work to resolve that situation amicably before the bill can move forward. “We can’t create 2,000 jobs in Arizona at the expense of 600 in California,” the Kirkpatrick aide said.

Despite the hurdles, Kirkpatrick believes the legislation will pass.

“I’m optimistic that we can find common ground and balance and move this project ahead,” she said.

Nosie said the tribe will keep working with Kirkpatrick on other issues, but he won’t support her reelection.

“She gave Indian Country a great hope,” the chairman said on a recent Sunday morning at the Oak Flats Campground. “And now that’s wiped clean.” He paused. “Another politician. Another politician that played us good.”

These remarks are significant.

“Back in Arizona I’m hearing you’re supporting Resolution Copper,” Nosie recalled saying. “Ann, the reason why I’m here is because you had told me that you would definitely hear both sides of the story,” Nosie said.

“Chairman, tell me, how is your religion going to put food on the table?” Ann Kirkpatrick asked. “Tell me how your religion is going to help the children getting abused by their parents. How is your religion going to turn the bed sheets of your elders?”

“Ann, don’t even go there,” Nosie said.

“I think we’re selling ourselves short. This company, I don’t trust them,” Grijalva said recently, noting he felt there weren’t strict enough environmental protections in Kirkpatrick’s bill. “We’re willing to sit and talk about an alternative legislative solution,” he said.

“She gave Indian Country a great hope,” the chairman said on a recent Sunday morning at the Oak Flats Campground. “And now that’s wiped clean.” He paused. “Another politician. Another politician that played us good.”

“Doing the reclamation was a way for us to demonstrate to the community that we would take care of the environment,” said David Salisbury, Resolution Copper’s chief executive.

Resolution Copper is a subsidiary of Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold, headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, an ALEC member corporation. Aside from being an ALEC company, Freeport McMoRan has an abominable record of human rights violations in third world countries, where it conducts business. This record includes murdering persons objecting to their business practices, as well as working conditions outlawed in the western world as unsafe and unsanitary. Resolution Copper, therefore, should be less than concerned with any form of reclamation. Freeport McMoRan’s past, supported by public record, establishes this. Reclamation of Navajo land, from the mining of uranium, during and after World War Two, has yet to happen. The flooding of the Rio Puerco on the southern border of the Navajo Nation, the famous Church Rock disaster, because of failed containment efforts of radioactive waste from uranium mining, was never answered. The cleanup of Three Mile Island, a contemporary disaster, in contrast, began almost immediately. Clearly, indigenous peoples are considered ‘collateral damage’ by US business.

Raul Grijalva has spoken of “an alternative legislative solution”. He stated, about Resolution Copper, “I think we’re selling ourselves short. This company, I don’t trust them.” The elephant in the room is the question of why we must continue to allow the rape of the land, and destruction of indigenous cultures, by multi-national corporations, as our only consideration for business, when so many other, clean, businesses exist.

Rick Renzi’s corruption is legendary. His indictment cost him his re-election. One is compelled to remember, Mrs. Kirkpatrick was so unpopular with her constituents that she was voted out of office. It is also worthy of note that Senator McCain has joined with Senator Kyl in spearheading efforts to rob the Navajo and Hopi nations of their federally guaranteed ancestral claims to Colorado river water, only to balustrade the business of Peabody Coal, another ALEC corporation.

“Chairman, tell me, how is your religion going to put food on the table?” Kirkpatrick said. “Tell me how your religion is going to help the children getting abused by their parents. How is your religion going to turn the bed sheets of your elders?” is a painful reminder of another quote by a colleague of Rep. Paul Gosar, Dr. David Eichler, who suggested during an Alaskan court battle, in an online message board, that Native tribes had “poor dental health due to ignorance and deserved to die out.” Western civilisation’s hubris, insensitivity, and total disregard for the civlisations of indigenous peoples stem the first contact by Columbus.

Considering Ann Kirkpatrick’s connections to other ALEC contributors to her campaign, one must question her concern over jobs being created in the Superior region. As already noted, “Critics say it’ll be years before the first paychecks are cut, because the mine is almost a decade away from becoming fully operational.” The Apache nation is about to take another leap.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Following the Money From Arizona to Washington

English: , member of the United States House o...

Former US Representative Ann Kirkpatrick

The American Legislative Exchange Council, ALEC, was founded in 1973 by Paul Weyrich, the man who coined the phrase, “Moral Majority”, and, with Jerry Falwell, embarked upon a homophobic crusade, hearkening to the time of Joe McCarthy. This is no coincidence, since the monies used for ALEC’s founding came largely from the coffers of Charles and David Koch, sons of Fred C. Koch. Robert Welch and Fred Koch were principal founders of the John Birch Society, which still extols McCarthyism as an heroic American value.

ALEC’s mission statement declares it exists to “advance principles of free markets, limited government, federalism, and individual liberty, through a nonpartisan public-private partnership of America’s state legislators, members of the private sector, the federal government, and general public.” Remembering history, Benito Mussolini also sought a “public-private partnership” of “legislators…the federal government, (and) members of the private sector”. He called this fascism.

The Arizona Association for Economic Development was founded, a year later, in 1974, “by a small group of economic development professionals and business leaders dedicated to expanding the industrial and economic base of Arizona. This group came together to discuss issues affecting Arizona’s economic development, to promote economic development in the State of Arizona through an interchange of information and educational opportunities among its members, to act as a liaison with outside groups having the same objectives, to influence legislation affecting economic development and to continually improve working relationships among its diverse membership”, according to its webpage. The similarities in objectives, between ALEC and the Arizona Association for Economic Development are striking. One is compelled to question whether the Arizona group might be an offshoot of ALEC.

TRIADVOCATES LLC is a significant member of the Arizona Association for Economic Development. TRIADVOCATES provides integrated local, state and federal lobbying, and government relations consulting services throughout Arizona. Its principal member is Kimberly Knox.

The Policy Development Group, also an Arizona lobbyist, is a product of Ron Ober, who ran successful campaigns for retired US Senator Dennis DeConcini, of the ‘Keating Five’ scandal fame. DeConcini’s current interest is involvement in the Corrections Corporation of America, the notorious private prison system, where he sits on the board of directors for a sum of $175,000.00 per year. CCA is an ALEC member corporation.

Sal Baldenegro has stated that Sen. DeConcini has urged potential donors to the election campaign of Wenona Benally Baldenegro to walk away and provide her with no monies, which would impair her chances of being elected to the US House of Representatives.

Senator DeConcini, Ron Ober, and Kimberly Knox are listed as official donors to the campaign of former US Representative Ann Kirkpatrick. Other donors include Richard Harris Silverman, General Manager of Salt River Project, Judith Williams, President of SRP, Gena P. Trimble, Manager, SRP, Mark B. Bonsall, Executive Management, SRP, Jane Alfano Rasor, attorney, SRP, and John F. Sullivan, Associate General Manager, SRP. Salt River Project is an ALEC member corporation. Ms. Kirkpatrick’s donors also include a Washington D.C. lobbying firm, Wexler and Walker Public Policy Associates, a division of Hill & Knowlton, one of the oldest public relations firms in the United States. Hill & Knowlton designed the tobacco industry‘s strategy for counteracting scientific evidence which linked cigarette smoking to lung cancer. Wexler and Walker Public Policy Associates were founded by Anne Wexler, 1981. Wexler has been listed as one of the most powerful women in the Washington, D.C. by The Washingtonian. Wexler is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Former Representative Ann Kirkpatrick voted NO on HR 1256, the FDA Oversight of Tobacco Products, aiding and abetting Big Tobacco. Her connections to destructive mining practices are even more insidious. Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold, headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, is an ALEC member corporation. Resolution Copper is connected to Freeport McMoRan, through a web of partnerships. Resolution Copper currently threatens to establish the world’s largest copper mine on sacred Apache land. Ann Kirkpatrick, along with former US Representative Rick Renzi (R), Flagstaff, both endorsed measures to allow this venture to come to fruition.

An irrefutable pattern exists. Ms. Kirkpatrick has supported the destructive mining prospects of an ALEC corporation. She aided ALEC supported Big Tobacco, by voting against HR 1256, and has received financial support from senior employees of an ALEC member corporation and a CCA board member, himself with a past soiled by corruption. Her supporters include a wealthy and very influential Washington lobbying firm. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks like a duck, it’s a duck.

Sources:

Maplight.org /us-congress/contributions?s=1&office_party=all&election=all&politician=768&business_sector=Lawyers %26 Lobbyists&business_industry=Lobbyists&start=07%2F01%2F2009&end=06%2F30%2F2011

Votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/28425/

http://threesonorans.com/tag/ann-kirkpatrick/

http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/azelections/articles/2010/03/19/20100319arizona-mine-bill.html

opensecrets.org/politicians/pacs.php?cycle=2010&cid=N00029260&sector=E&seclong=Energy+%26+Natural+Resources&cat=E04&induslong=Mining&newMem=N

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Take a Stand

Seal of Maricopa County, Arizona

“You’ve got to stand for something, or you’ll fall for anything!”

Aaron Tippin

The citizens of Maricopa County have a choice in the impending Sheriff’s election. They can maintain the status quo, perpetuating a regime of sporadic, targeted law enforcement, where the incarcerated stands a very good chance of being tortured to death, as in the case of Marty Artencio, and several other preceding prisoners, of inhumane incarceration in tents, chain gangs, denial of medications, and international embarrassment. They may also choose one of two challengers to the regime, a former police sergeant in the country’s sixth largest police agency, with no command experience, or a lieutenant in a bedroom community of the same city, who, by virtue of his rank, has limited command experience. The Arizona Democratic Party supports the sergeant. The same cabal of ultra conservative wealthy Arizonans, who support Joe Arpaio, endorse the lieutenant, a former Republican, running as an independent.

Another choice exists, a Democratic candidate, who retired from the largest police agency in the nation, NYPD, at the rank of Deputy Assistant Chief, John Rowan. This is a man who currently teaches ethics and community policing at the college level, and who was delegated the task of overhauling and administering New York’s police department and the security agency in Iraq. Rowan was deployed by NYPD at ground zero, on September 11, 2001. Naysayers within the Democratic Party will declare Rowan’s having been recently terminated by Goodyear Police Department. This is true. He was indeed terminated. However, what naysayers fail to report, is the actual reason for his termination. Rowan testified in court, pertinent to police involvement in a fatal hit and run collision with a teenaged pedestrian. He refused to participate in a police coverup of a wrongful death. His testimony resulted in several early retirements and terminations, including those of both the Chief of Police and the City Manager of Goodyear. Subsequent to this, Rowan has endured numerous threats. On his way out the door, the city manager, not being used to such treatment, fired John Rowan. Therefore,  Rowan paid with the loss of his job, for having the integrity to tell the truth. He is currently paying for his integrity, by having his, and his family’s, personal safety jeopardized. Perhaps it is actually true that the voters in Maricopa County have no choice. They can either perpetuate the status quo or elect a sheriff with the background, dedication, and integrity to effectively clean house in MCSO,  before the U.S. Department of Justice is forced to step in. You decide. Take a stand.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

From Kayenta to Washington

English: Another Shot of Kayenta, AZ.

Kayenta, Arizona, Image via Wikipedia

Arizona Democratic voters have a choice. Wenona Benally Baldenegro is the other Democratic candidate for Arizona Congressional District One. She was born and raised in Kayenta, Arizona, where she graduated High School as salutatorian. A child from a single parent household in an economically depressed community, she went on to achieve not only a college education, but two Masters Degrees and a law degree from Harvard. Despite her advanced education, she has not forgotten her roots. Education such as this guarantees employment in a Wall Street legal firm. Rather than seeking wealth from the private sector, Wenona chooses to serve the People of Arizona by providing quality, affordable healthcare, protecting Social Security and Medicare, protecting our environment, and by investing in clean, sustainable energy. Despite the Arizona Democratic Party’s favoring Ann Kirkpatrick, and discouraging donors from giving monies to Wenona, then broadcasting her not being electable, because of her being unable to raise money, Wenona Benally Baldenegro tenaciously clings to her grass roots campaign, focused on winning. It is this tenacity, with her working class roots and stellar education, which make Wenona the superior candidate.

Arizona Democratic voters have a choice, and the choice is clear. Elect a candidate who  ignored the needs of the People and served corporate interests while in office, or install Wenona Benally Baldenegro as the Representative from Congressional District One. Have a leader who will stand up for working people, seniors, and middle class families, and protect our fragile environment, and who will restore our image as proud Arizonans. Representative Raul Grijalva  endorsed Wenona because she will fight for fair wages and workers rights. She endorses the DREAM Act, opposes SB 1070,  and will protect Social Security and Medicare. Wenona supports FAIR TRADE, not free trade, and is against outsourcing US jobs. Arizonans have a choice. The choice is clear. Continue and exacerbate disenfranchisement and neglect, or move toward a brighter, happier future. The choice is yours.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Arpaio and the Rule of Law

 

 

Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona...

Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona speaking at the Tea Party Patriots American Policy Summit in Phoenix, Arizona. Please attribute to Gage Skidmore if used elsewhere. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio has exclaimed repeatedly that he supports the Rule of Law. But, what is the Rule of Law? Does Rule of Law require strict, blind obedience, obeying all laws completely, even bad laws? Does it mean rigid application to certain segments of society, but not to others? According to Friedrich von Hayek it does. Hayek and Ludwig von Mises were pivotal in the Austrian school of economic thought. Hayek, later a faculty member of the University of Chicago, was influential upon the Chicago School of Economics. Hayek wrote, “….because the rule of law means that government must never coerce an individual, except in the enforcement of a known rule…..” and “….the conception of the rule of law is confused with the requirement of mere legality in all government action.” Hayek also wrote, “The rule of law is not a rule of the law, but a rule concerning what the law ought to be.” This is significant, “what the law ought to be” rather than a “rule of the law”. Aristotle declared, “Law should govern”. This, obviously,  is a very ancient concept. Law should govern, not the capricious whims of one man. If the rule of law does not imply the rule of the law, what does it imply?

Another way of framing this concept is the declaration “Equal Justice Under Law”. In addition to all persons, regardless of status, being subject to the law, all persons, regardless of status, are protected by the law. Selective enforcement and unequal enforcement, is repugnant to the Rule of Law. Simply stated, the United States is a nation of laws, not a nation ruled by the whims of a dictator, at least, not yet. When a nation is not ruled by law, where selective enforcement exists, so does tyranny. Due to Hayek’s philosophy, Rule of Law has become a buzz word of the Cato institute, and Hayek’s narrow view has proliferated among the ultra conservative.

Rule of law determines everyone in society is subject to the law. Everyone, even those who enforce the law, those who write it, as well as citizens or non-citizens are subject to the law. This means law enforcement must stand by it, and the law abiding citizen, the criminal, children, foreign visitors, even the undocumented alien, is protected by it. This is how a civilized society works. Capricious or sporadic enforcement is incongruent.  Therefore, application of the law with ethnic or racial profiling involved is wrong, according to the American theory of jurisprudence, wherein justice must be applied equally and in every case. Many citizens and non citizens alike have complained that Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s deputies, with his direction, have singled them out and harassed them only because of their skin colour or assumed ethnicity. Video has captured images of persons disagreeing with Arpaio’s methods and focus being singled out and arrested for speaking  against him. They are charged with criminal trespass in open, public meetings, which they have a right to attend. This would be at least a mistaken application of the Rule of Law. At most, if intent could be demonstrated, it would be criminal. Equal Justice Under Law is a precept of the United States of America. Unless our country has devolved into an abyss of tyranny and dictatorship, the Rule of Law still survives, and Arpaio, if he acts in accordance with it, must stop his practice of discrimination against the Latino and the economically disenfranchised.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio has publically discussed his retirement. One would hope that his legacy is not a continuation of “Unequal Justice Under Law”, of selective enforcement and discrimination. The culture of abuse runs deeply in the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office. Racial and ethnic profiling in law enforcement, deaths of inmates from torture during interrogation, denial of, or inadequate  necessary medical support until the inmate must be admitted to the ER, and neglect from exposing inmates to extremes of temperature in tents, with poor nutrition, are merely symptoms of a deeper, greater disease.

In post Arpaio MCSO, a general house cleaning is in order. Policies and procedures must be examined, personnel must be scrutinized, and selective, discriminatory practices must be eliminated. The United States of America is a nation of laws. It is time to remember that.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments